LabourCodes360
Case Law Library

High Court / Supreme Court Judgements

Labour law case law, digested for HR and compliance teams. Every entry gives you the summary, the key legal principle, what it means in practice for employers, the related Labour Code provisions, and the original judgement to download.

- views- Downloads- shares

2 judgements

High CourtGratuitySocial Security Code 2020

Kanknarrah Jute Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta High Court28 Sept 2026WPA 17299 of 2026

The Calcutta High Court dismissed an employer’s challenge to gratuity recovery orders in a dispute concerning compound interest on outstanding dues that included simple interest. The employer stated that it had paid the entire principal gratuity amount and that only part of the simple interest remained unpaid. It argued that Section 8 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 did not permit compound interest to be levied on that outstanding interest component. The Court held that Section 8 applies when the controlling authority issues a certificate for recovery of gratuity payable. The certificate follows the authority’s payment order, and the amount directed to be paid includes simple interest on the principal gratuity. Finding no scope for a different interpretation, the Court declined to interfere with the challenged orders.

High CourtGratuityCode on Wages 2019

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Five-Year Service Requirement for Gratuity

Karnataka High Court 29 Jun 2026NC:2026:KHC:32106

The Karnataka High Court, in Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Nandeesh H.V., held that an employee who resigned after completing only 4 years, 9 months and 12 days was not entitled to gratuity under Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Since the employee had not completed the mandatory five years of continuous service and no statutory exception applied, the Court quashed the gratuity orders passed by the Controlling and Appellate Authoritie